Rough Drafts and Peer Comments of Digital Arguments (HW#15-16)

I give one check for submitting rough drafts on time, and one check for giving peers constructive feedback (HW#15 and HW#16).

Here are the peer review questions:

  • What call to action is the digital argument making?
  • What is the best thing the digital argument is doing to catch your attention?
  • How does the visual build credibility (if it doesn’t, make a suggestion for improving this)?
  • What is the biggest thing this digital argument can work on to make it better (and convince you to do something about this issue!)?